Background:
Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL) is generally sensitive to pegaspargase-based induction chemotherapy, and inadequate response to induction therapy will predict dismal prognosis. 18F-FDG PET/CT scan has been consistently shown valuable in staging, response assessment, and prediction of long-term outcomes in ENKTCL. Patients with five-point Deauville score (5-DS) ≥4 at interim PET-CT scan are usually defined as positive for residual lymphoma lesions and demand subsequent switch of treatment regimens or strategies. However, through re-biopsy of suspected lesions revealed by interim PET-CT scan, we found most were false-positive, and those patients had similar prognosis compared with patients who had 5-DS ≤3 at interim PET-CT scan. Thus, a more accurate assessing method using PET-CT scan is urgently needed. A quantitative approach based on reduction in the standardized uptake values (ΔSUVmax) allows more objective evaluation of the PET response, which may reduce false-positive interim PET/CT interpretations.
Methods:
20 patients with newly diagnosed ENKTCL who underwent baseline and interim 18F-FDG PET/CT scans (after 3-4 cycles of pegaspargase-based induction chemotherapy) and with 5-DS≥4 at interim PET/CT were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients received re-biopsy of suspected lesions revealed by interim PET-CT scan. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine an optimal cutoff for ΔSUVmax in assessing early response to induction therapy. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze long-term survival outcomes.
Results:
16 (80%) patients had stage II disease, while four (20%) patients were diagnosed with stage IV disease. Nine (45%) patients presented with a NRI score≥3, and 70% of patients were classified as high risk according to the PINK score. After 3-4 cycles of induction chemotherapy, three (15%) patients had a 5-DS score of five at interim PET/CT, while the remaining 85% of patients had 5-DS score of four. Among these 20 patients, two (10%) were confirmed to have residual lymphoma via re-biopsy, while 18 (90%) patients obtained negative results and were defined as complete remission (CR). All patients with a 5-DS score of four exhibited negative results upon re-biopsy, while two out of three cases assigned a 5-DS score of five had positive pathology findings, indicating the potential false positive outcomes within the 5-DS scoring system, particularly among the patients with scores of four. Using ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off value for discriminating CR and non-CR was 66.75% for ΔSUVmax%, which represented good discriminative power with the area under curve (AUC) of 0.985. At a median follow-up time of 27 months, patients with re-biopsy-proven active disease presented a trend towards poorer outcomes compared to those achieving negative biopsy results in terms of PFS (P<0.001). Utilizing the ΔSUVmax% (> 66.75% vs ≤ 66.75%) between baseline and interim PET/CT scans, it was feasible to identify patients with significantly different PFS (P =0.003). The median PFS was unreached for patients with ΔSUVmax% > 66.75%, whereas it was 10 months for patients with ΔSUVmax% ≤ 66.75%.
Conclusions:
Utilizing ΔSUVmax% (>66.75%) between baseline and interim PET/CT scans can effectively identify a subset of patients who were visually analyzed as false positives (5-DS ≥ four), which were confirmed by interim biopsy results, thus serving as a more accurate indicator for early assessment of treatment outcomes in patients with ENKTCL.
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal